About Me

Name: txag007
Email: txag007@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Pie

Many thanks to Mark Levin for bringing the following quote to my attention. 
 
Michelle Obama, at a campaign stop on Tuesday said, "The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more." (emphasis mine)
 
The truth is that the idea that we live in a zero sum economy is not true at all.  It's also not capitalism.  The 1980s are a great example of why Mrs. Obama's statement is incorrect.  When we dramatically cut taxes across the board as we did under President Reagan, everyone gets more pie because we grow the size of the pie
 
The notion that the reason for the poor being poor is because the rich have money is nothing more than an exercise in class envy.  History says otherwise, and voters need to realize this before the November election.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Truth about Gas Prices

Earlier this week, the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming called executives from the major oil companies to testify regarding the rise in fuel prices. Representative Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, said at the hearing, “On April Fool’s Day, the biggest joke of all is being played on American families by Big Oil.” I disagree, and the information below should help put the issue of rising fuel prices in perspective.

In 2007, the oil companies only made 8.3 cents profit on every dollar of gasoline sold in the United States. The federal government takes 18.4 cents for every gallon sold.  Most states take several cents per gallon on top of that.

High gas prices are the result of restrictions placed on oil companies by the federal government which force reliance on an already crowded global market.

Investor’s Business Daily (3/25/08): Developing nations China and India, where the populations — already a third of the world population — and economies are growing, account for more than two-thirds of the increased (oil) consumption. Their use is expected to double in the next 20 years...We watch helplessly while prices at the pump reach $4 point in the priciest U.S. markets and as much as 131 billion barrels of oil remain off-limits beneath our soil and our waters.

To put this in perspective, the United States currently consumes around 20 million barrels of oil a day. 

On the research and development end, the government controls where each company can and cannot explore for new sources of oil as well as where they can and cannot drill in existing sources.

Investor’s Business Daily (3/31/08): The irony is that countries with fast-growing economies such as those in China, Brazil and India are accelerating energy resource development, while resource-rich North America is becoming captive to environmental extremism and continues to restrict access to oil supplies.

Investor’s Business Daily (3/4/08): Passing 236-182 last week, [HR 5351] scrapped the tax deduction routinely given to the major integrated oil companies — Exxon, Chevron, BP, Shell and ConocoPhillips — that helps them explore, extract, refine and market the energy that drives our economy. This will make it $18 billion more costly for those companies to produce oil…Under this bill, [Hugo Chavez's] oil subsidiary keeps its 6% deduction for U.S. domestic manufacturing — the one the American oil companies lose — because Citgo, technically, buys from Chavez.

Can you believe that?!?!  It's true.

On the production side, the governmental laws and regulations are so tight that it is not profitable to build new refineries.

Investor’s Business Daily (3/14/08): In 1982, the U.S. economy was served by 301 refineries. By 2007, the number had dwindled to 149. Productivity has kept output steady over the years at 17 million barrels a day. But the U.S. economy has grown by 125%. "Valero believes there will never be another refinery built in the U.S.," spokesman Bill Day told IBD. He cited costs, environmental regulations, neighborhood activism and lawsuits. "For a new refinery, it would take five years for a permit and five years for construction, and it's very expensive. A company would have to know it would pay off." Congress has been of no help whatsoever. Mandates requiring certain ethanol percentages in gasoline composition are chopping down refiners' market share at the pump. Refiners are undercut by the subsidies ethanol producers get that refiners don't. Ethanol producers are also protected by high tariffs on overseas ethanol, while imported gasoline comes in duty-free. This brings in a lot of competition for refiners.

Don’t forget that the 8.3 percent profit an oil company turns is subject to a 45% corporate income tax. Not only do the federal and state governments make more money from the sale of gasoline than do the oil companies, but it is the policies set forth by the government that are the fundamental reason Americans are paying so much at the pump these days.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »